The judge noted that Epic failed to demonstrate that Apple’s current policies caused immediate, irreparable damage that couldn't wait for a full appeal.
💡 The court prioritized procedural stability over immediate market disruption , keeping Apple's 30% cut intact—for now. If you would like to dive deeper, Judge denies Epic’s request to force Apple to b...
Apple argued that forcing immediate changes would compromise user security and require significant engineering resources before a final legal consensus is reached. Industry Implications The judge noted that Epic failed to demonstrate